The
Logic of “BUG CHASING AND GIFT GIVING:
THE POTENTIAL FOR
HIV
TRANSMISSION AMONG BAREBACKERS ON THE INTERNET”
I
am very interested in the phenomena of bug chasing and gift giving. This is not a term I had ever heard of
before. Bug chasing is when someone
looks to get infected with HIV on purpose.
A person that knowingly wants to give someone HIV is known as the gift giver. This concept seems so bizarre and foreign to
me because I had always thought of HIV and AIDS as a very negative, undesirable
and deadly disease. I looked on the
internet and found out about this phenomenon and the terminology surrounding
it.
The
main purpose of “BUG CHASING AND GIFT GIVING:
THE POTENTIAL FOR HIV TRANSMISSION AMONG BAREBACKERS ON THE INTERNET”
was to explore the prevalence and possible reasoning behind someone
intentionally becoming infected with HIV (Grove and Parsons 2006). Since bug chasing and gift giving is a
relatively new idea, there have not been any major published research papers on
the topic.
The
authors are trying to explore and find out how to reach the bug chasing and
gift giving subculture and to analyze the data they collected from a gay
dating/hookup website for men who have sex with other men. There is a small percentage of men who have
sex with other men who barebackers, which is to have unprotected anal sex
without a condom. Among barebackers,
there is a smaller subculture who identify as bug chasers or gift givers.
This
exploratory study looked at profiles on a barebacking website. The study looked at all the profiles and
picked out the 1,600 profiles that “specifically indicated they were a bug
chaser or gift giver” (Grove and Parsons 2006) on this website. The goal of this study was to explore bug
chasing and gift giving and to evaluate how big the problem has become.
The
study noted that the use of the internet assisted in locating like minded
sexual partners. Also because there are
many treatments available, the seriousness of HIV and AIDS transmission may not
be perceived as a “death sentence” as it once did. The following four reasons were given for bug
chasers to choose to be infected with HIV:
1) Fear – the feeling that getting HIV is inevitable and they would
rather choose their time/method of infection, thereby taking control of the
situation; 2) Eroticism – in the risk of potentially being
infected; 3) Loneliness – a feeling of being left out,
sometimes accompanied by survivor guilt when others they care about have become
HIV positive; and 4) Political action – empowering themselves by
reinforcing negative stereotypes society places on gay men.
When
analyzing the profiles, six categories of bug chasers and gift givers became evident: 1) The
Committed Bug Chaser – who is HIV negative, looking for HIV positive partners
and indicated receptive sexual positioning;
2) The Opportunistic Bug Chaser – who is HIV negative and sexual
partners status didn’t matter and were versatile with sexual positioning; 3) The
Committed Gift Giver – who is HIV positive looking for HIV negative sexual
partners; 4) The Opportunistic Gift Giver – who is HIV
positive and sexual partners status did not matter; 5) The
Serosorter – who selected profile of a bug chaser or gift giver, but actively
looking for a sexual partner that is the
same HIV status as themselves; and 6) The Ambiguous Bug Chaser or Gift Giver – who
didn’t know his HIV status and was seeking a sexual partner of a specific HIV
status (Grove and Parsons 2006).
The
study found that while the incidence of bug chasing and gift giving may be
going up, the prevalence may not be as high as it originally seemed. Different information in the profiles did not
always match the bug chasing or gift giving status selected. For example, someone who selected that they
were a bug chaser may not have shown a preference towards a sexual partner that
is HIV positive, nor any preference to being an insertive or receptive sexual
partner. The study noted that “it seems
bug chasing and gift giving are an infrequent phenomenon” (Grove and Parsons
2006). Of gay men who have sex with
other men, not all are barebackers. Of
the barebackers, not all classify themselves as a bug chaser or gift
giver. Even of those men who did
classify themselves in this way, many of these men were not actively seeking
out sexual partners with a differing HIV status. The main outcome of this study is to
recognize the bug chasing and gift giving subculture as real, realize that more
in depth studies and outreach needs to be done to educate gay men who may
consider a bug chasing or gift giving lifestyle.
HIV
should not be sought after. Even though
treatments are better than they have been in the past, HIV should still be
avoided if at all possible. People that
don’t have HIV risk being infected with drug resistant strains of the
virus. People that are HIV positive may
potentially get a more potent strain of
HIV. If this phenomenon is not studied
in depth, then people will not be properly educated as to the dangers that
still exist. Bug chasing and gift giving
may be a reality for a lot of people. We
need to research it more, come up with a plan and execute to keep purposeful
HIV infections down. This isn’t a
problem that society can just ignore.
Works
Cited
Christian Grove and
Jeffrey T. Parsons. “BUG CHASING AND
GIFT GIVING: THE POTENTIAL FOR HIV
TRANSMISSION AMONG BAREBACKERS ON THE INTERNET.” AIDS Education and Prevention, 18(6),490-503,2006,
Web. June 17, 2016
Comments
Post a Comment